한영2학년 4주차 진단고사
Quiz Summary
0 of 10 Questions completed
Questions:
Information
You have already completed the quiz before. Hence you can not start it again.
Quiz is loading…
You must sign in or sign up to start the quiz.
You must first complete the following:
Results
Results
0 of 10 Questions answered correctly
Your time:
Time has elapsed
You have reached 0 of 0 point(s), (0)
Earned Point(s): 0 of 0, (0)
0 Essay(s) Pending (Possible Point(s): 0)
Average score |
|
Your score |
|
Categories
- Not categorized 0%
-
필독
아래의 “View Questions”를 클릭하면 정답 및 해설을 볼 수 있습니다.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Current
- Review
- Answered
- Correct
- Incorrect
-
Question 1 of 10
1. Question
1. 다음 빈칸에 들어갈 말로 가장 적절한 것을 고르시오.
In the early decades of the 20th century, a slew of technologies began altering daily life with seemingly unprecedented speed and breadth. Suddenly, consumers could enjoy affordable automobiles. Long-distance telephone service connected New York with San Francisco. Electric power and radio broadcasts came into homes. New methods for making synthetic fertilizer portended a revolution in agriculture. And on the horizon, airplanes promised ________. As the technology historian Thomas P. Hughes noted: “The remarkably prolific inventors of the late nineteenth century, such as Thomas Edison, persuaded us that we were involved in a second creation of the world.” By the 1920s, this world — more functional, more sophisticated and increasingly more comfortable — had come into being.
① a drastic increase in global industrial output
② a notable shift in environmental policies
③ an essential progression in educational methodologies
④ a change in leisure and entertainment trends
⑤ a fundamental change in travel and commerceCorrectIncorrect -
Question 2 of 10
2. Question
2. 주어진 글 다음에 이어질 글의 순서로 가장 적절한 것을 고르시오.
Deep-fried foods are tastier than bland foods, and children and adults develop a taste for such foods. Fatty foods cause the brain to release oxytocin, a powerful hormone with a calming, antistress, and relaxing influence, said to be the opposite of adrenaline, into the blood stream; hence the term “comfort foods.”
(A) People also had to hunt down animals or gather plants for their food, and that took a lot of calories. It’s different these days. We have food at every turn – lots of those fast-food places and grocery stores with carry-out food.
(B) But that ingrained “caveman mentality” says that we can’t ever get too much to eat. So craving for “unhealthy” food may actually be our body’s attempt to stay healthy.
(C) We may even be genetically programmed to eat too much. For thousands of years, food was very scarce. Food, along with salt, carbs, and fat, was hard to get, and the more you got, the better. All of these things are necessary nutrients in the human diet, and when their availability was limited, you could never get too much.
① (A) – (C) – (B) ② (B) – (A) – (C) ③ (B) – (C) – (A)
④ (C) – (A) – (B) ⑤ (C) – (B) – (A)CorrectIncorrect -
Question 3 of 10
3. Question
3. 다음 글의 요지로 가장 적절한 것은?
My stepfather’s experience with the Anglicization of his name-Antonio to Tony-ties into something bigger than learning English. For him, the erasure of his name was about deference and subservience. Becoming Tony gave him a measure of access as he struggled to learn English and get more fieldwork.
This isn’t to say that my stepfather welcomed the change, only that he could not put up much resistance. Not changing put him at risk of being passed over for work. English was a world of power and decisions, of smooth, uninterrupted negotiation. There was no time to search for the right word while a shop clerk waited for him to come up with the English name of the correct part needed out in the field. Clear communication meant you could go unsupervised, or that you were even able to read instructions directly off a piece of paper. Every gesture made toward convincing an employer that English was on its way to being mastered had the potential to make a season of fieldwork profitable.
It’s curious that many of us growing up in Dinuba adhered to the same rules. Although as children of farm workers we worked in the fields at an early age, we’d also had the opportunity to stay in one town long enough to finish school. Most of us had learned English early and splintered off into a dual existence of English at school, Spanish at home. But instead of recognizing the need for fluency in both languages, we turned it into a peculiar kind of battle. English was for public display. Spanish was for privacy and privacy quickly turned to shame.
① 언어의 습득은 사회적 통합을 촉진하는 중요한 요소이다.
② 이름을 영어로 변경하는 것은 환영받지 못하는 행위이다.
③ 언어와 이름의 변화는 개인의 정체성과 직업적 기회에 영향을 미친다.
④ 이중 언어 사용은 개인의 사회적 삶에 중요한 역할을 한다.
⑤ 언어의 변화는 의도하지 않은 개인의 사회적 적응 과정을 반영한다.CorrectIncorrect -
Question 4 of 10
4. Question
4. 글의 흐름으로 보아, 주어진 문장이 들어가기에 가장 적절한 곳을 고르시오.
It was simultaneously the language of the white population and a path toward the richer, expansive identity of “American.”
Spanish was and still is viewed with suspicion: always the language of the vilified illegal immigrant, it segregated school children into English-only and bilingual programs; it defined you, above all else, as part of a lower class. ( ① ) Learning English, though, brought its own complications with identity. ( ② ) But it took getting out of the Valley for me to understand that “white” and “American” were two very different things. ( ③ ) Something as simple as saying our names “in English” was our unwittingly complicit gesture of trying to blend in. Pronouncing Mexican names correctly was never encouraged. ( ④ ) Names like Daniel, Olivia and Marco slipped right into the mutability of the English language. I remember a school ceremony at which the mathematics teacher, a white man, announced the names of Mexican students correctly and caused some confusion, if not embarrassment. ( ⑤ ) Years later we recognized that he spoke in deference to our Spanish Speaking parents in the audience, caring teacher that he was.
CorrectIncorrect -
Question 5 of 10
5. Question
- 다음 글의 내용과 일치하지 않는 것을 2개 고르시오.
When trying to sustain an independent ethos, cultures face a problem of critical mass. No single individual, acting on his or her own, can produce an ethos. Rather, an ethos results from the interdependent acts of many individuals. This cluster of produced meaning may require some degree of insulation from larger and wealthier outside forces. The Canadian Inuit maintain their own ethos, even though they number no more than twenty-four thousand. They manage this feat through a combination of trade, to support their way of life, and geographic isolation. The Inuit occupy remote territory, removed from major population centers of Canada. If cross-cultural contact were to become sufficiently close, the Inuit ethos would disappear. Distinct cultural groups of similar size do not, in the long run, persist in downtown Toronto, Canada, where they come in contact with many outside influences and pursue essentially Western paths for their lives.
① An ethos is created by the collective actions of numerous individuals rather than by a single person.
② The Canadian Inuit have a population of approximately twenty-four thousand people.
③ The Inuit’s cultural independence is maintained solely through their geographic isolation.
④ Cross-cultural interactions could potentially lead to the dissolution of the Inuit ethos.
⑤ Small distinct cultural groups can endure in downtown Toronto due to limited external influences.
CorrectIncorrect -
Question 6 of 10
6. Question
- 다음 글의 주제로 가장 적절한 것은?
These were difficult names for a non-Spanish speaker: Araceli, Nadira, Luis (a beautiful name when you glide the u and the i as you’re supposed to). We had been accustomed to having our birth names altered for convenience. Concepcion was Connie. Ramon was Raymond. My cousin Esperanza was Hope-but her name was pronounced “Hopie” because any Spanish speaker would automatically pronounce thee at the end.
Ours, then, were names that stood as barriers to a complete embrace of an American identity, simply because their pronunciations required a slip into Spanish, the otherness that assimilation was supposed to erase. What to do with names like Amado, Lucio or Elida? There are no English “equivalents,” no answer when white teachers asked, “What does your name mean?” when what they really wanted to know was “What’s the English one?” So what you heard was a name butchered beyond recognition, a pronunciation that pointed the finger at the Spanish language as the source of clunky sound and ugly rhythm.
My stepfather, from Ojos de Agua, Mexico, jokes when I ask him about the names of Mexicans born here. He deliberately stumbles over pronunciations, imitating our elders who have difficulty with Bradley and Madelyn. “Ashley Sanchez. Tu crees?” He wonders aloud what has happened to the “nombres del rancho”- traditional Mexican names that are hardly given anymore to children born in the States: Heraclio, Madaleno, Otilia, Dominga.
① The challenges of pronouncing Spanish names for non-Spanish speakers
② The impact of American assimilation on traditional Mexican names
③ The humorous perspective on name pronunciation by a Mexican stepfather
④ The significance of names in maintaining cultural identity
⑤ The process of altering birth names for convenience in the United States
CorrectIncorrect -
Question 7 of 10
7. Question
- 다음 글을 바탕으로 추론할 수 없는 것을 고르시오.
What is it about the wreck of the R.M.S. Titanic? Why, a century later, do people still lavish so much brainpower and technological ingenuity upon this graveyard of metal more than two miles beneath the ocean surface? Why, like Pearl Harbor, ground zero, and only a few other hallowed disaster zones, does it exert such a magnetic pull on our imagination?
For some the sheer extravagance of Titanic’s demise lies at the heart of its attraction. This has always been a story of superlatives: A ship so strong and so grand, sinking in water so cold and so deep. For others the Titanic’s fascination begins and ends with the people on board. It took two hours and 40 minutes for the Titanic to sink, just long enough for 2,208 tragic-epic performances to unfold.
One coward is said to have made for the lifeboats dressed in women’s clothing, but most people were honorable, many heroic. The captain stayed at the bridge, the band played on, the Marconi wireless radio operators continued sending their distress signals until the very end. The passengers, for the most part, kept to their Edwardian stations. How they lived their final moments is the stuff of universal interest, a danse macabre that never ends.
But something else, beyond human lives, went down with the Titanic: An illusion of orderliness, a faith in technological progress, a yearning for the future that, as Europe drifted toward full-scale war, was soon replaced by fears and dreads all too familiar to our modern world. “There was such a sense of bounty in the first decade of the 20th century. Elevators! Automobiles! Airplanes! Wireless radio! Everything seemed so wondrous, on an endless upward spiral. Then it all came crashing down,” said James Cameron.
We went out by the lighthouse and looked over the cold sea, which crashed into the cliffs below. An oil tanker cruised in the distance. Farther out, on the Grand Banks, new icebergs had been reported. Farther out still, somewhere beyond the bulge of the horizon, lay the most famous shipwreck in the world. My mind raced with thoughts of signals bouncing in the ionosphere—the propagation of radio waves, the cry of ages submerged in time. And I imagined I could hear the voice of the Titanic herself: A vessel with too much pride in her name, sprinting smartly toward a new world, only to be mortally nicked by something as old and slow as ice.
① The sinking of the Titanic is a subject of enduring fascination due to the dramatic nature of its demise and the stories of those on board.
② The Titanic disaster is often remembered not just for the tragic loss of life but also for the broader implications it had on society’s view of technological advancement.
③ The Titanic’s story is marked by instances of both cowardice and heroism, highlighting the range of human behaviors in crisis situations.
④ The Titanic continues to capture the imagination, similar to other historic sites of tragedy that resonate deeply with collective human emotions.
⑤ Modern technology has completely solved the mysteries surrounding the Titanic’s sinking.
CorrectIncorrect -
Question 8 of 10
8. Question
8. 다음 글을 바탕으로 추론할 수 있는 것을 고르시오.
After the dust of World War I settled and the troops came home — or didn’t come home — it became evident that the world was changed forever. World War I ushered in a modern era of warfare with new fighting methods that affected an entire generation of young people.
New technology introduced during World War I shaped the way wars would be fought from then on. For the first time, tanks, airplanes and machine guns made their way onto the battlefield. These new technologies magnified the effects of war, both in terms of how war was fought, but also how war affected people. World War I had a devastating effect on the world in terms of lives lost, with over 37 million casualties
Countries that were hit hardest by the war lost entire villages of men. Those who came home were profoundly affected by their war experience. Feeling cynical about humanity’s prospects, they rebelled against the values of their elders, seeking debauchery instead of decency, and hedonism instead of ideology.
① The introduction of new technologies in World War I led to a decrease in the number of casualties compared to previous wars.
② The veterans of World War I generally returned to their pre-war lifestyles and values without significant psychological impact.
③ The use of tanks, airplanes, and machine guns in World War I significantly increased the scale and impact of warfare, influencing future conflicts.
④ World War I was primarily fought using traditional combat techniques and strategies that had been in use for centuries.
⑤ The majority of World War I veterans were celebrated as heroes and seamlessly reintegrated into society, maintaining traditional values.CorrectIncorrect -
Question 9 of 10
9. Question
9. 다음 빈칸에 들어갈 말로 가장 적절한 것을 고르시오.
Many people picture confidence as a seesaw. Gain too much confidence, and we tip toward arrogance. Lose too much confidence, and we become meek. This is our fear with humility: that we’ll end up having a low opinion of ourselves. We want to keep the seesaw balanced, so we go into Goldilocks mode and look for ________. Recently, though, I learned that this is the wrong approach.
Humility is often misunderstood. It’s not a matter of having low self-confidence. One of the Latin roots of humility means “from the earth.” It’s about being grounded—recognizing that we’re flawed and fallible. Confidence is a measure of how much you believe in yourself. Evidence shows that’s distinct from how much you believe in your methods. You can be confident in your ability to achieve a goal in the future while maintaining the humility to question whether you have the right tools in the present. That’s the sweet spot of confidence.
① the perfect balance of personal understanding
② the sufficient quantity of self-trust
③ an equilibrium of emotional stability
④ the state of self-assurance that suits perfectly
⑤ the right amount of confidenceCorrectIncorrect -
Question 10 of 10
10. Question
10. 다음 글의 밑줄 친 부분 중, 문맥상 낱말의 쓰임이 적절하지 않은 것은?
One vivid example of how a market mindset can ①alter and ②weaken an institution is given by Dan Ariely in his book Predictably Irrational. He tells the story of a day care center in Israel that decided to fine parents who arrived late to pick up their children, in the hope that this would discourage them from doing so. In fact, the exact opposite happened. Before the imposition of fines, parents felt guilty about arriving late, and guilt was effective in ensuring that only a few did so. Once a fine was introduced, it seems that in the minds of the parents the entire scenario was changed from a social contract to a market one. Essentially, they were paying for the center to look after their children after hours. Some parents thought it worth the price, and the rate of late arrivals ③escalated. Significantly, once the center abandoned the fines and went back to the previous arrangement, late arrivals remained at the high level they had reached during the period of the fines. The implementation of fines intended to ④encourage late pickups had an unintended consequence. By monetizing the time, the daycare essentially allowed parents to feel less ⑤remorseful about being late.
CorrectIncorrect